• Business
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Sports
    • Football
    • Cricket
  • Travel
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • About
  • Advertise
Facebook Twitter Instagram
News Night
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Sports
    1. Football
    2. Cricket
    3. View All

    Semi-Professional Football

    February 8, 2022

    How to Play Fantasy Football for Beginners

    February 8, 2022

    Four Different Baltimore Pro Football Teams Have Won Championships

    February 8, 2022

    The Premise of Fantasy Football

    February 8, 2022

    ODI World Cup 2023 Warm-up games: England beat Bangladesh; New Zealand emerge victorious against South Africa

    October 3, 2023

    ENG vs BAN Live Streaming Channel In India- When And Where To Watch ICC World Cup Warm Up Match Live? 2023

    October 2, 2023

    South Africa legend Dale Steyn names the top 5 fast bowlers to watch out for in ODI World Cup 2023

    October 1, 2023

    India vs England Head-to-Head Records In ODIs- ICC World Cup 2023, Warm Up Match

    September 30, 2023

    Concussion in rugby union and rugby league: How stars are uniting to turn the tide | Rugby Union News

    October 3, 2023

    ODI World Cup 2023 Warm-up games: England beat Bangladesh; New Zealand emerge victorious against South Africa

    October 3, 2023

    Antony: Manchester United player could return against Galatasaray on Tuesday, says Erik ten Hag | Football News

    October 2, 2023

    ENG vs BAN Live Streaming Channel In India- When And Where To Watch ICC World Cup Warm Up Match Live? 2023

    October 2, 2023
  • Travel
Subscribe
News Night
Home»Technology»Sam Bankman-Fried, in First Detailed Defense, Seeks to Dismiss Charges
Technology

Sam Bankman-Fried, in First Detailed Defense, Seeks to Dismiss Charges

AdminBy AdminMay 9, 2023No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has issued his first detailed legal defense since prosecutors accused him of fraud, seeking to dismiss several of the charges and claiming that the high-powered law firm representing FTX in its bankruptcy has been doing the government’s bidding.

In court filings late Monday, lawyers for Mr. Bankman-Fried said FTX and its lawyers at the firm Sullivan & Cromwell had become de facto agents of federal prosecutors building the criminal case against him and might be withholding crucial evidence.

“FTX’s legal advisors went to the government to accuse Mr. Bankman-Fried behind his back without knowing the full facts, and ultimately forced him to step down as C.E.O.,” the lawyers wrote.

For months, Sullivan & Cromwell has funneled documents and other evidence to the prosecution, the filings say. Mr. Bankman-Fried’s lawyers claimed that prosecutors had been seeking only the most incriminating documents, even though FTX might also be sitting on material that could help the defense.

In effect, they argued, prosecutors have been “outsourcing” the legal requirement to provide potentially helpful material to the defense team, shifting that responsibility to a “private party” with no obligation to Mr. Bankman-Fried.

Representatives for FTX, Sullivan & Cromwell and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Federal prosecutors have charged Mr. Bankman-Fried with orchestrating a vast fraud that misappropriated billions of dollars in customer money from FTX. The authorities have also charged him with money laundering, bribing the Chinese government and overseeing an illegal campaign finance scheme that showered tens of millions of dollars on Democratic and Republican candidates.

Mr. Bankman-Fried, 31, has pleaded not guilty to those charges. His lawyers at the New York firm Cohen & Gresser have said they are prepared to go to trial in federal court in Manhattan as soon as October.

Mr. Bankman-Fried was released on bail in December but confined to his parents’ home in Palo Alto, Calif. He faces an uphill legal battle. Three of his top colleagues have pleaded guilty and are cooperating with prosecutors. If convicted, he could spend decades in a federal prison.

The motions filed on Monday are most likely the first of many attempts by Mr. Bankman-Fried’s legal team either to seek the production of more documents from prosecutors or to persuade Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan to dismiss some of the 13 counts against him.

In all, Mr. Bankman-Fried is seeking to dismiss 10 of the charges. The filings argue that four of the counts — including the foreign bribery charge, the campaign finance charge and a bank fraud charge — violated elements of the extradition process between the United States and the Bahamas, where Mr. Bankman-Fried was arrested. In extradition cases, prosecutors are usually limited in bringing new charges after a defendant has been transferred.

The defense lawyers argued that another six of the charges should be dismissed for being too vague or having other legal flaws. They said the prosecutors had displayed an “eagerness to run up charges against Mr. Bankman-Fried.”

Much of the defense’s early strategy also focuses on the role of Sullivan & Cromwell in the case. Mr. Bankman-Fried had hired lawyers from the firm to help with a range of legal tasks before FTX collapsed. When the exchange imploded, Sullivan & Cromwell’s lawyers took control, naming a veteran restructuring expert, John Jay Ray III, to replace Mr. Bankman-Fried. One of Mr. Ray’s first acts was to issue a scathing report that said FTX under Mr. Bankman-Fried had lacked internal controls.

But in January, the U.S. trustee in the bankruptcy case raised objections to the law firm’s representation of FTX, arguing that it had not fully disclosed the extent of its previous legal work for the exchange. One of FTX’s former internal lawyers claimed in a court filing that Sullivan & Cromwell’s earlier work created major conflicts of interest.

A judge ultimately ruled that the firm could continue to oversee the bankruptcy.

In the court filings on Monday, Mr. Bankman-Fried portrays Mr. Ray, FTX and the lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell as all working against him, with the blessing of the government.

Mr. Ray, FTX and the lawyers “have acted as a public mouthpiece for the government” and “have assumed the role of prosecutor by publicly labeling” Mr. Bankman-Fried as “‘the villain,’” the filings say.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Astronomers express concerns over light pollution from massive new satellite

October 3, 2023

X Social Media is suing X, a social media company

October 2, 2023

Ageism in the workplace: Tips for fighting it while job searching

October 2, 2023

Cardinals vs. 49ers Livestream: How to Watch NFL Week 4 Online Today

October 1, 2023
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Search
© 2023 NewsNight. All Rights Reserved by News Night.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.